1. Introduction

C63200 aluminum bronze, a high-performance copper-based alloy, is widely used in critical applications across marine, aerospace, oil and gas, and heavy machinery industries. This comprehensive analysis examines C63200 alongside its potential equivalent alternatives, providing detailed comparisons of chemical composition, mechanical properties, manufacturing considerations, and cost-performance ratios. This guide aims to assist procurement specialists, engineers, and material selection professionals in making informed decisions when sourcing materials for demanding applications.

2. C63200 Aluminum Bronze: Baseline Specifications

Table 1: Chemical Composition of C63200 Aluminum Bronze (%)

AlС участиемFePbMnNiА также
8,7-9,5Рем.3,5-4,300,02 макс.1,2-2,04,0-4,80.1 макс.
9.0000*82.0000*4.0000*-1.6000*4.0000*-

*Nominal values

Table 2: Mechanical Properties of C63200 Aluminum Bronze

ИмуществоФормование и изгибЕд. изм
Предел прочности621-950МПа
Предел текучести310-365МПа
Удлинение9-25%
Твердость по Бринеллю120-210HB
Плотность7.6г / см³
Модуль упругости110ГПа
Формование и изгиб42W/m·K
Коэффициент температурного расширения16.2μm/m·K
Электрическая проводимость7% IACS

3. Direct Equivalent Alternatives to C63200

3.1 International Standard Equivalents

Table 3: International Standards Equivalents for C63200

СтранаСтандартОбозначениеEquivalence Level
Соединенные Штаты АмерикиАСТМАУНС C63200Reference
ЕвропаНАCuAl10Ni5Fe4Высокий
ГерманияИЗCuAl10Ni5Fe4Высокий
Соединенное КоролевствоBSCA106Высокий
ЯпонияJISCAC702Середина
КитайГБQAl10-4-4Высокий
РоссияГОСТBrAZhNMts 9-4-4-1Середина
МеждународныйISOCuAl10Fe5Ni5Средне-высокий

3.2 Chemical Composition Comparison

Table 4: Chemical Composition Comparison of C63200 and Its Direct Equivalents (%)

СплавСтандартAlС участиемFePbMnNiА такжеДругие
C63200АСТМА8,7-9,5Рем.3,5-4,300,02 макс.1,2-2,04,0-4,80.1 макс.-
CuAl10Ni5Fe4НА8.5-10.5Рем.3,0-5,000,02 макс.0.5-2.54.0-6.00.1 макс.Zn≤0.5
CA106BS8.8-10.0Рем.3,0-5,000,01 макс.0.5-2.04.0-5.50.1 макс.Zn≤0.5
CAC702JIS8.5-10.0Рем.2,0-4,000,05 макс.1,5-3,04.0-5.50.3 макс.-
QAl10-4-4ГБ9.0-10.5Рем.3.5-5.000,01 макс.0.5-2.04,0-5,00.1 макс.-

3.3 Mechanical Properties Comparison

Table 5: Mechanical Properties Comparison of C63200 and Direct Equivalents

СплавПрочность на растяжение (МПа)Предел текучести (МПа)Удлинение (%)Твердость (HB)
C63200 (ASTM)621-950310-3659-25120-210
CuAl10Ni5Fe4 (EN)650-830300-35010-20140-200
CA106 (BS)640-800300-34012-18140-190
CAC702 (JIS)590-780280-33010-18130-180
QAl10-4-4 (GB)640-820300-35010-20140-200

4. Alternative Material Categories

4.1 Other Aluminum Bronze Grades

Table 6: Alternative Aluminum Bronze Grades Comparison

СплавUNS#Ал (%)Ключевые различияОтносительная стоимостьРейтинг производительности
C63000C630009,0-11,0Higher Al, similar properties105%Высокий
C63020C6302010.0-11.5Higher strength, less ductile110%Высокий
C62300C623008.5-10.0Lower Ni, reduced strength85%Средне-высокий
C95400C9540010.0-11.5No Ni, lower corrosion resistance80%Середина
C95500C9550010.0-11.5Contains Ni, higher strength90%Высокий

4.2 Nickel Aluminum Bronze Alternatives

Table 7: Nickel Aluminum Bronze Alternatives

СплавUNS#Key CompositionКлючевые свойстваCost Ratio to C63200Best Applications
C95800C95800Cu-9Al-4Fe-4NiHigher corrosion resistance115%Marine propellers, pumps
C95700C95700Cu-12Al-6Fe-2NiБолее высокая прочность, меньшая пластичность110%Подшипники для тяжелых условий эксплуатации
C95900C95900Cu-12Al-6Ni-2.5FeОтличная износостойкость120%Aircraft landing gear parts

4.3 Non-Aluminum Bronze Alternatives

Table 8: Non-Aluminum Bronze Alternative Materials

Material CategoryExample AlloyKey Properties ComparisonCost RatioCompatibility
Фосфорная бронзаC52400Lower strength, better electrical conductivity75%Середина
Manganese BronzeC86300Higher strength, lower corrosion resistance80%Середина
Silicon BronzeC87300Better machinability, lower wear resistance85%Середина
C17200 Бериллиевый медный стерженьC17200 Бериллиевый медный стерженьHigher strength, excellent spring properties180%Medium-Low
Nickel-SilverC75200Lower strength, good corrosion resistance90%Low-Medium

4.4 Non-Copper Based Alternatives

Table 9: Non-Copper Based Alternative Materials

Material CategoryExample GradeComparative PerformanceCost RatioApplication Overlap
Нержавеющая сталь316 лHigher strength, lower friction65%Середина
Никелевые сплавыМонелс 400Superior corrosion resistance, higher cost160%High for marine
Титановые сплавыТи-6Ал-4ВHigher strength-to-weight, much higher cost280%Low-Medium
Engineered PlasticsPEEKLightweight, self-lubricating, lower strength85%Низкий
Composite BearingsPTFE/FiberLow friction, limited load capacity70%Очень низкий

5. Cost-Performance Analysis

5.1 Relative Material Cost Index

Table 10: Relative Material Cost Index (C63200 = 100)

МатериалСтоимость сырьяСтоимость обработкиTotal Cost IndexCost Trend (2-Year)
C63200100100100Stable
CuAl10Ni5Fe4 (EN)95-10595-10595-105Stable
C63000100-110100-105100-108Slight increase
C9540075-8590-10080-90Stable
C95800110-120105-115110-120Increasing
316L Stainless55-6570-8060-70Volatile
Монелс 400150-170140-160145-165Increasing
PEEK160-18040-5080-90Stable

5.2 Performance Rating by Application

Table 11: Performance Rating by Application (1-10 scale, 10=best)

МатериалморскойOil & GasАэрокосмическая промышленностьHeavy MachineryOverall Value Rating
C6320098898,5
CuAl10Ni5Fe498898,5
C9540077687,5
C9580099888,8
316L Stainless77667,5
Монелс 40099767,0
PEEK67856,5

6. Manufacturing Considerations

6.1 Processability Comparison

Table 12: Manufacturing Process Suitability (1-10 scale, 10=excellent)

МатериалЛитье в песокЦентробежное литьеКастинг по выплавляемым моделямОбрабатываемостьСвариваемость
C6320099876
CuAl10Ni5Fe499876
C9540089765
C9580089766
316L Stainless67858
Монелс 40067757
PEEKН/ДН/ДН/Д8Н/Д

6.2 Supply Chain Considerations

Table 13: Supply Chain Factors

МатериалGlobal AvailabilityLead Time (weeks)Supplier DiversityPrice Stability
C63200Высокий4-6ВысокийСередина
CuAl10Ni5Fe4Высокий4-6ВысокийСередина
C95400Высокий3-5ВысокийСередина
C95800Средне-высокий5-8СерединаLow-Medium
316L StainlessОчень высоко2-4Очень высокоСередина
Монелс 400Середина6-10СерединаНизкий
PEEKСередина3-5СерединаВысокий

7. Application-Specific Equivalence

Table 14: Recommended Alternatives by Application

заявкаFirst ChoiceSecond ChoiceThird ChoiceKey Selection Factor
Marine bearingsC63200C95800Монелс 400Устойчивость к коррозии
Компоненты клапанаC63200CuAl10Ni5Fe4316 лPressure handling
Pump bushingsC63200C95400C95800Обычно используемые марки бериллиевой меди следующие:
ШестерниC63200C95500Hardened steelСила
Hydraulic componentsC63200CuAl10Ni5Fe4PEEKPressure capacity
Оборудование для самолетовC63200C95900Ти-6Ал-4ВWeight optimization
Offshore equipmentC63200C95800Монелс 400Устойчивость к коррозии

8. Selection Methodology for Equivalent Materials

Table 15: Decision Matrix for Material Selection

Selection FactorМассаC63200CuAl10Ni5Fe4C95800316L SSМонелс 400PEEK
Mechanical strength20%998875
Устойчивость к коррозии25%889799
Обычно используемые марки бериллиевой меди следующие:20%998676
Экономическая эффективность15%776856
Доступность10%887967
Processability10%888768
Weighted Score100%8.258.257,857.306.906,75

9. Conclusion and Recommendations

C63200 aluminum bronze remains an excellent material choice for demanding applications requiring a combination of strength, corrosion resistance, and wear properties. The most direct equivalent alternatives are found in the European standard CuAl10Ni5Fe4 and the Chinese standard QAl10-4-4, which offer nearly identical performance characteristics and cost.

For cost-sensitive applications where some performance compromise is acceptable, C95400 aluminum bronze presents a viable alternative at approximately 15-20% lower cost. In highly corrosive environments, particularly seawater applications, C95800 nickel aluminum bronze may justify its 10-20% higher cost through superior longevity.

For procurement professionals, the following recommendations apply:

  1. Request material certification documentation to verify composition and properties
  2. Consider regional availability and lead times in sourcing decisions
  3. Evaluate total cost of ownership including maintenance and replacement frequency
  4. Build relationships with multiple suppliers to ensure material availability
  5. For critical applications, conduct performance testing with alternative materials before full implementation

By carefully evaluating the equivalence factors presented in this analysis, procurement specialists and engineers can make informed decisions when selecting alternatives to C63200 aluminum bronze, balancing performance requirements with cost considerations.