1. Introdução

C63200 aluminum bronze, a high-performance copper-based alloy, is widely used in critical applications across marine, aerospace, oil and gas, and heavy machinery industries. This comprehensive analysis examines C63200 alongside its potential equivalent alternatives, providing detailed comparisons of chemical composition, mechanical properties, manufacturing considerations, and cost-performance ratios. This guide aims to assist procurement specialists, engineers, and material selection professionals in making informed decisions when sourcing materials for demanding applications.

2. C63200 Aluminum Bronze: Baseline Specifications

Table 1: Chemical Composition of C63200 Aluminum Bronze (%)

AlCuFePbMnDentroE
8.7-9.5Rem.3.5-4.30.02 máx1,2-2,04.0-4.800,1 máx.
9.0000*82.0000*4.0000*1.6000*4.0000*

*Nominal values

Table 2: Mechanical Properties of C63200 Aluminum Bronze

PropriedadeValorUnidade
Resistência à tracção621-950MPa
Força de rendimento310-365MPa
Alongamento9-25%
Dureza Brinell120-210HB
Densidade7.6g/cm³
Módulos de elasticidade110GPa
Condutividade térmica42S/m·K
Coeficiente de Expansão Térmica16.2μm/m·K
Condutividade elétrica7% IACS

3. Direct Equivalent Alternatives to C63200

3.1 International Standard Equivalents

Table 3: International Standards Equivalents for C63200

PaísPadrãoDesignaçãoEquivalence Level
EUAASTMUNS C63200Reference
EuropaDENTROCuAl10Ni5Fe4Alto
AlemanhaA PARTIR DECuAl10Ni5Fe4Alto
Reino UnidoBSCA106Alto
JapãoELECAC702Médio
ChinaGBQAl10-4-4Alto
RússiaGOSTBrAZhNMts 9-4-4-1Médio
InternacionalISOCuAl10Fe5Ni5Médio-alto

3.2 Chemical Composition Comparison

Table 4: Chemical Composition Comparison of C63200 and Its Direct Equivalents (%)

LigaPadrãoAlCuFePbMnDentroEOutros
C63200ASTM8.7-9.5Rem.3.5-4.30.02 máx1,2-2,04.0-4.800,1 máx.
CuAl10Ni5Fe4DENTRO8.5-10.5Rem.3,0-5,00.02 máx00,5-2,54.0-6.000,1 máx.Zn≤0.5
CA106BS8.8-10.0Rem.3,0-5,000,01 máx.0.5-2.04.0-5.500,1 máx.Zn≤0.5
CAC702ELE8.5-10.0Rem.2,0-4,000,05 máx.1.5-3.04.0-5.500,3 máx.
QAl10-4-4GB9.0-10.5Rem.3,5-5,000,01 máx.0.5-2.04.0-5.000,1 máx.

3.3 Mechanical Properties Comparison

Table 5: Mechanical Properties Comparison of C63200 and Direct Equivalents

LigaResistência à tração (MPa)Força de rendimento (MPa)Alongamento (%)Dureza (HB)
C63200 (ASTM)621-950310-3659-25120-210
CuAl10Ni5Fe4 (EN)650-830300-35010-20140-200
CA106 (BS)640-800300-34012-18140-190
CAC702 (JIS)590-780280-33010-18130-180
QAl10-4-4 (GB)640-820300-35010-20140-200

4. Alternative Material Categories

4.1 Other Aluminum Bronze Grades

Table 6: Alternative Aluminum Bronze Grades Comparison

LigaUNS#Al (%)Principais diferençasRelative CostPerformance Rating
C63000C630009,0-11,0Higher Al, similar properties105%Alto
C63020C6302010.0-11.5Higher strength, less ductile110%Alto
C62300C623008.5-10.0Lower Ni, reduced strength85%Médio-alto
C95400C9540010.0-11.5No Ni, lower corrosion resistance80%Médio
C95500C9550010.0-11.5Contains Ni, higher strength90%Alto

4.2 Nickel Aluminum Bronze Alternatives

Table 7: Nickel Aluminum Bronze Alternatives

LigaUNS#Key CompositionPropriedades principaisCost Ratio to C63200Best Applications
C95800C95800Cu-9Al-4Fe-4NiHigher corrosion resistance115%Marine propellers, pumps
C95700C95700Cu-12Al-6Fe-2NiHigher strength, lower ductility110%Rolamentos para serviços pesados
C95900C95900Cu-12Al-6Ni-2.5FeExcelente resistência ao desgaste120%Aircraft landing gear parts

4.3 Non-Aluminum Bronze Alternatives

Table 8: Non-Aluminum Bronze Alternative Materials

Material CategoryExample AlloyKey Properties ComparisonCost RatioCompatibility
Phosphor BronzeC52400Lower strength, better electrical conductivity75%Médio
Manganese BronzeC86300Higher strength, lower corrosion resistance80%Médio
Silicon BronzeC87300Better machinability, lower wear resistance85%Médio
Cobre BerílioC17200Higher strength, excellent spring properties180%Médio-baixo
Nickel-SilverC75200Lower strength, good corrosion resistance90%Baixo-médio

4.4 Non-Copper Based Alternatives

Table 9: Non-Copper Based Alternative Materials

Material CategoryExample GradeComparative PerformanceCost RatioApplication Overlap
Aço inoxidável316LHigher strength, lower friction65%Médio
Ligas de níquelMonéis 400Superior corrosion resistance, higher cost160%High for marine
Titanium AlloysTi-6al-4VHigher strength-to-weight, much higher cost280%Baixo-médio
Engineered PlasticsPEEKLightweight, self-lubricating, lower strength85%Baixo
Composite BearingsPTFE/FiberLow friction, limited load capacity70%Very Low

5. Cost-Performance Analysis

5.1 Relative Material Cost Index

Table 10: Relative Material Cost Index (C63200 = 100)

MaterialCusto da matéria-primaCusto de processamentoTotal Cost IndexCost Trend (2-Year)
C63200100100100Stable
CuAl10Ni5Fe4 (EN)95-10595-10595-105Stable
C63000100-110100-105100-108Slight increase
C9540075-8590-10080-90Stable
C95800110-120105-115110-120Increasing
316L Stainless55-6570-8060-70Volatile
Monéis 400150-170140-160145-165Increasing
PEEK160-18040-5080-90Stable

5.2 Performance Rating by Application

Table 11: Performance Rating by Application (1-10 scale, 10=best)

MaterialMarinhoOil & GasAeroespacialMáquinas PesadasOverall Value Rating
C6320098898,5
CuAl10Ni5Fe498898,5
C9540077687,5
C9580099888.8
316L Stainless77667,5
Monéis 40099767,0
PEEK67856.5

6. Considerações de fabricação

6.1 Processability Comparison

Table 12: Manufacturing Process Suitability (1-10 scale, 10=excellent)

MaterialSand CastingFundição CentrífugaInvestment CastingMaquinabilidadeSoldabilidade
C6320099876
CuAl10Ni5Fe499876
C9540089765
C9580089766
316L Stainless67858
Monéis 40067757
PEEKN / DN / DN / D8N / D

6.2 Supply Chain Considerations

Table 13: Supply Chain Factors

MaterialGlobal AvailabilityLead Time (weeks)Supplier DiversityPrice Stability
C63200Alto4-6AltoMédio
CuAl10Ni5Fe4Alto4-6AltoMédio
C95400Alto3-5AltoMédio
C95800Médio-alto5-8MédioBaixo-médio
316L StainlessMuito alto2-4Muito altoMédio
Monéis 400Médio6-10MédioBaixo
PEEKMédio3-5MédioAlto

7. Application-Specific Equivalence

Table 14: Recommended Alternatives by Application

InscriçãoFirst ChoiceSegunda escolhaThird ChoiceKey Selection Factor
Marine bearingsC63200C95800Monéis 400Resistência à corrosão
Componentes da válvulaC63200CuAl10Ni5Fe4316LPressure handling
Pump bushingsC63200C95400C95800Resistência ao desgaste
EngrenagensC63200C95500Hardened steelForça
Hydraulic componentsC63200CuAl10Ni5Fe4PEEKPressure capacity
acessórios para aeronavesC63200C95900Ti-6al-4VWeight optimization
Offshore equipmentC63200C95800Monéis 400Resistência à corrosão

8. Selection Methodology for Equivalent Materials

Table 15: Decision Matrix for Material Selection

Selection FactorPesoC63200CuAl10Ni5Fe4C95800316L SSMonéis 400PEEK
Mechanical strength20%998875
Resistência à corrosão25%889799
Resistência ao desgaste20%998676
Cost-effectiveness15%776856
Disponibilidade10%887967
Processability10%888768
Weighted Score100%8.258.257,857.306.906,75

9. Conclusion and Recommendations

C63200 aluminum bronze remains an excellent material choice for demanding applications requiring a combination of strength, corrosion resistance, and wear properties. The most direct equivalent alternatives are found in the European standard CuAl10Ni5Fe4 and the Chinese standard QAl10-4-4, which offer nearly identical performance characteristics and cost.

For cost-sensitive applications where some performance compromise is acceptable, C95400 aluminum bronze presents a viable alternative at approximately 15-20% lower cost. In highly corrosive environments, particularly seawater applications, C95800 nickel aluminum bronze may justify its 10-20% higher cost through superior longevity.

For procurement professionals, the following recommendations apply:

  1. Request material certification documentation to verify composition and properties
  2. Consider regional availability and lead times in sourcing decisions
  3. Evaluate total cost of ownership including maintenance and replacement frequency
  4. Build relationships with multiple suppliers to ensure material availability
  5. For critical applications, conduct performance testing with alternative materials before full implementation

By carefully evaluating the equivalence factors presented in this analysis, procurement specialists and engineers can make informed decisions when selecting alternatives to C63200 aluminum bronze, balancing performance requirements with cost considerations.