1. Introduction

C63200 aluminum bronze, a high-performance copper-based alloy, is widely used in critical applications across marine, aerospace, oil and gas, and heavy machinery industries. This comprehensive analysis examines C63200 alongside its potential equivalent alternatives, providing detailed comparisons of chemical composition, mechanical properties, manufacturing considerations, and cost-performance ratios. This guide aims to assist procurement specialists, engineers, and material selection professionals in making informed decisions when sourcing materials for demanding applications.

2. C63200 Aluminum Bronze: Baseline Specifications

Table 1: Chemical Composition of C63200 Aluminum Bronze (%)

アルそして
8.7-9.5レム。3.5-4.30最大.021.2~2.04.0~4.80最大.1
9.0000*82.0000*4.0000*1.6000*4.0000*

*Nominal values

Table 2: Mechanical Properties of C63200 Aluminum Bronze

財産価値Unit
抗張力621-950MPa
降伏強さ310-365MPa
伸長9-25%
ブリネル硬度120-210HB
密度7.6g/cm3
弾性率110GPa
熱伝導率42W/m・K
熱膨張係数16.2μm/m・k
電気伝導性7% IACS

3. Direct Equivalent Alternatives to C63200

3.1 International Standard Equivalents

Table 3: International Standards Equivalents for C63200

標準指定Equivalence Level
アメリカ合衆国ASTM米国 C63200Reference
ヨーロッパCuAl10Ni5Fe4高い
ドイツからCuAl10Ni5Fe4高い
イギリスBSCA106高い
日本CAC702中くらい
中国GBQAl10-4-4高い
ロシアゴストBrAZhNMts 9-4-4-1中くらい
国際的ISOCuAl10Fe5Ni5中~高

3.2 Chemical Composition Comparison

Table 4: Chemical Composition Comparison of C63200 and Its Direct Equivalents (%)

合金標準アルそしてその他
C63200ASTM8.7-9.5レム。3.5-4.30最大.021.2~2.04.0~4.80最大.1
CuAl10Ni5Fe48.5-10.5レム。3.0~5.00最大.020.5-2.54.0-6.00最大.1Zn≤0.5
CA106BS8.8-10.0レム。3.0~5.00最大.010.5-2.04.0-5.50最大.1Zn≤0.5
CAC7028.5-10.0レム。2.0~4.00最大.051.5-3.04.0-5.50最大.3
QAl10-4-4GB9.0-10.5レム。3.5-5.00最大.010.5-2.04.0-5.00最大.1

3.3 Mechanical Properties Comparison

Table 5: Mechanical Properties Comparison of C63200 and Direct Equivalents

合金引張強さ(MPa)降伏強さ(MPa)伸長 (%)硬度(HB)
C63200 (ASTM)621-950310-3659-25120-210
CuAl10Ni5Fe4 (EN)650-830300-35010-20140-200
CA106 (BS)640-800300-34012-18140-190
CAC702 (JIS)590-780280-33010-18130-180
QAl10-4-4 (GB)640-820300-35010-20140-200

4. Alternative Material Categories

4.1 Other Aluminum Bronze Grades

Table 6: Alternative Aluminum Bronze Grades Comparison

合金UNS#アルミニウム(%)主な違い相対コストパフォーマンス評価
C63000C630009.0-11.0Higher Al, similar properties105%高い
C63020C6302010.0-11.5Higher strength, less ductile110%高い
C62300C623008.5-10.0Lower Ni, reduced strength85%中~高
C95400C9540010.0-11.5No Ni, lower corrosion resistance80%中くらい
C95500C9550010.0-11.5Contains Ni, higher strength90%高い

4.2 Nickel Aluminum Bronze Alternatives

Table 7: Nickel Aluminum Bronze Alternatives

合金UNS#Key Composition主要なプロパティCost Ratio to C63200Best Applications
C95800C95800Cu-9Al-4Fe-4NiHigher corrosion resistance115%Marine propellers, pumps
C95700C95700Cu-12Al-6Fe-2Ni強度は高く、延性は低い110%Heavy-duty bearings
C95900C95900Cu-12Al-6Ni-2.5FeExcellent wear resistance120%Aircraft landing gear parts

4.3 Non-Aluminum Bronze Alternatives

Table 8: Non-Aluminum Bronze Alternative Materials

Material CategoryExample AlloyKey Properties ComparisonCost RatioCompatibility
リン青銅C52400Lower strength, better electrical conductivity75%中くらい
マンガン青銅C86300Higher strength, lower corrosion resistance80%中くらい
Silicon BronzeC87300Better machinability, lower wear resistance85%中くらい
ベリリウム銅C17200Higher strength, excellent spring properties180%Medium-Low
Nickel-SilverC75200Lower strength, good corrosion resistance90%Low-Medium

4.4 Non-Copper Based Alternatives

Table 9: Non-Copper Based Alternative Materials

Material CategoryExample GradeComparative PerformanceCost RatioApplication Overlap
ステンレス鋼316LHigher strength, lower friction65%中くらい
ニッケル合金モネル400Superior corrosion resistance, higher cost160%High for marine
チタン合金Ti-6Al-4VHigher strength-to-weight, much higher cost280%Low-Medium
Engineered PlasticsPEEKLightweight, self-lubricating, lower strength85%低い
Composite BearingsPTFE/FiberLow friction, limited load capacity70%非常に低い

5. Cost-Performance Analysis

5.1 Relative Material Cost Index

Table 10: Relative Material Cost Index (C63200 = 100)

材料原材料費処理コストTotal Cost IndexCost Trend (2-Year)
C63200100100100Stable
CuAl10Ni5Fe4 (EN)95-10595-10595-105Stable
C63000100-110100-105100-108Slight increase
C9540075-8590-10080-90Stable
C95800110-120105-115110-120Increasing
316L Stainless55-6570-8060-70Volatile
モネル400150-170140-160145-165Increasing
PEEK160-18040-5080-90Stable

5.2 Performance Rating by Application

Table 11: Performance Rating by Application (1-10 scale, 10=best)

材料マリンOil & Gas航空宇宙Heavy MachineryOverall Value Rating
C6320098898.5
CuAl10Ni5Fe498898.5
C9540077687.5
C9580099888.8
316L Stainless77667.5
モネル40099767.0
PEEK67856.5

6。製造上の考慮事項

6.1 Processability Comparison

Table 12: Manufacturing Process Suitability (1-10 scale, 10=excellent)

材料砂型鋳造遠心鋳造インベストメント鋳造被削性溶接性
C6320099876
CuAl10Ni5Fe499876
C9540089765
C9580089766
316L Stainless67858
モネル40067757
PEEK該当なし該当なし該当なし8該当なし

6.2 Supply Chain Considerations

Table 13: Supply Chain Factors

材料Global AvailabilityLead Time (weeks)Supplier DiversityPrice Stability
C63200高い4-6高い中くらい
CuAl10Ni5Fe4高い4-6高い中くらい
C95400高い3-5高い中くらい
C95800中~高5-8中くらいLow-Medium
316L Stainless非常に高い2-4非常に高い中くらい
モネル400中くらい6-10中くらい低い
PEEK中くらい3-5中くらい高い

7. Application-Specific Equivalence

Table 14: Recommended Alternatives by Application

応用First Choice2番目の選択Third ChoiceKey Selection Factor
Marine bearingsC63200C95800モネル400耐食性
Valve componentsC63200CuAl10Ni5Fe4316LPressure handling
Pump bushingsC63200C95400C95800耐摩耗性
歯車C63200C95500Hardened steel強さ
Hydraulic componentsC63200CuAl10Ni5Fe4PEEKPressure capacity
航空機の付属品C63200C95900Ti-6Al-4VWeight optimization
Offshore equipmentC63200C95800モネル400耐食性

8. Selection Methodology for Equivalent Materials

Table 15: Decision Matrix for Material Selection

Selection Factor重さC63200CuAl10Ni5Fe4C95800316L SSモネル400PEEK
Mechanical strength20%998875
耐食性25%889799
耐摩耗性20%998676
Cost-effectiveness15%776856
可用性10%887967
Processability10%888768
Weighted Score100%8.258.257.857.306.906.75

9. Conclusion and Recommendations

C63200 aluminum bronze remains an excellent material choice for demanding applications requiring a combination of strength, corrosion resistance, and wear properties. The most direct equivalent alternatives are found in the European standard CuAl10Ni5Fe4 and the Chinese standard QAl10-4-4, which offer nearly identical performance characteristics and cost.

For cost-sensitive applications where some performance compromise is acceptable, C95400 aluminum bronze presents a viable alternative at approximately 15-20% lower cost. In highly corrosive environments, particularly seawater applications, C95800 nickel aluminum bronze may justify its 10-20% higher cost through superior longevity.

For procurement professionals, the following recommendations apply:

  1. Request material certification documentation to verify composition and properties
  2. Consider regional availability and lead times in sourcing decisions
  3. Evaluate total cost of ownership including maintenance and replacement frequency
  4. Build relationships with multiple suppliers to ensure material availability
  5. For critical applications, conduct performance testing with alternative materials before full implementation

By carefully evaluating the equivalence factors presented in this analysis, procurement specialists and engineers can make informed decisions when selecting alternatives to C63200 aluminum bronze, balancing performance requirements with cost considerations.