C63200 aluminum bronze, a high-performance copper-based alloy, is widely used in critical applications across marine, aerospace, oil and gas, and heavy machinery industries. This comprehensive analysis examines C63200 alongside its potential equivalent alternatives, providing detailed comparisons of chemical composition, mechanical properties, manufacturing considerations, and cost-performance ratios. This guide aims to assist procurement specialists, engineers, and material selection professionals in making informed decisions when sourcing materials for demanding applications.
Table 1: Chemical Composition of C63200 Aluminum Bronze (%)
アル
銅
鉄
鉛
ん
で
そして
8.7-9.5
レム。
3.5-4.3
0最大.02
1.2~2.0
4.0~4.8
0最大.1
9.0000*
82.0000*
4.0000*
–
1.6000*
4.0000*
–
*Nominal values
Table 2: Mechanical Properties of C63200 Aluminum Bronze
財産
価値
Unit
抗張力
621-950
MPa
降伏強さ
310-365
MPa
伸長
9-25
%
ブリネル硬度
120-210
HB
密度
7.6
g/cm3
弾性率
110
GPa
熱伝導率
42
W/m・K
熱膨張係数
16.2
μm/m・k
電気伝導性
7
% IACS
3. Direct Equivalent Alternatives to C63200
3.1 International Standard Equivalents
Table 3: International Standards Equivalents for C63200
国
標準
指定
Equivalence Level
アメリカ合衆国
ASTM
米国 C63200
Reference
ヨーロッパ
で
CuAl10Ni5Fe4
高い
ドイツ
から
CuAl10Ni5Fe4
高い
イギリス
BS
CA106
高い
日本
彼
CAC702
中くらい
中国
GB
QAl10-4-4
高い
ロシア
ゴスト
BrAZhNMts 9-4-4-1
中くらい
国際的
ISO
CuAl10Fe5Ni5
中~高
3.2 Chemical Composition Comparison
Table 4: Chemical Composition Comparison of C63200 and Its Direct Equivalents (%)
合金
標準
アル
銅
鉄
鉛
ん
で
そして
その他
C63200
ASTM
8.7-9.5
レム。
3.5-4.3
0最大.02
1.2~2.0
4.0~4.8
0最大.1
–
CuAl10Ni5Fe4
で
8.5-10.5
レム。
3.0~5.0
0最大.02
0.5-2.5
4.0-6.0
0最大.1
Zn≤0.5
CA106
BS
8.8-10.0
レム。
3.0~5.0
0最大.01
0.5-2.0
4.0-5.5
0最大.1
Zn≤0.5
CAC702
彼
8.5-10.0
レム。
2.0~4.0
0最大.05
1.5-3.0
4.0-5.5
0最大.3
–
QAl10-4-4
GB
9.0-10.5
レム。
3.5-5.0
0最大.01
0.5-2.0
4.0-5.0
0最大.1
–
3.3 Mechanical Properties Comparison
Table 5: Mechanical Properties Comparison of C63200 and Direct Equivalents
合金
引張強さ(MPa)
降伏強さ(MPa)
伸長 (%)
硬度(HB)
C63200 (ASTM)
621-950
310-365
9-25
120-210
CuAl10Ni5Fe4 (EN)
650-830
300-350
10-20
140-200
CA106 (BS)
640-800
300-340
12-18
140-190
CAC702 (JIS)
590-780
280-330
10-18
130-180
QAl10-4-4 (GB)
640-820
300-350
10-20
140-200
4. Alternative Material Categories
4.1 Other Aluminum Bronze Grades
Table 6: Alternative Aluminum Bronze Grades Comparison
合金
UNS#
アルミニウム(%)
主な違い
相対コスト
パフォーマンス評価
C63000
C63000
9.0-11.0
Higher Al, similar properties
105%
高い
C63020
C63020
10.0-11.5
Higher strength, less ductile
110%
高い
C62300
C62300
8.5-10.0
Lower Ni, reduced strength
85%
中~高
C95400
C95400
10.0-11.5
No Ni, lower corrosion resistance
80%
中くらい
C95500
C95500
10.0-11.5
Contains Ni, higher strength
90%
高い
4.2 Nickel Aluminum Bronze Alternatives
Table 7: Nickel Aluminum Bronze Alternatives
合金
UNS#
Key Composition
主要なプロパティ
Cost Ratio to C63200
Best Applications
C95800
C95800
Cu-9Al-4Fe-4Ni
Higher corrosion resistance
115%
Marine propellers, pumps
C95700
C95700
Cu-12Al-6Fe-2Ni
強度は高く、延性は低い
110%
Heavy-duty bearings
C95900
C95900
Cu-12Al-6Ni-2.5Fe
Excellent wear resistance
120%
Aircraft landing gear parts
4.3 Non-Aluminum Bronze Alternatives
Table 8: Non-Aluminum Bronze Alternative Materials
Material Category
Example Alloy
Key Properties Comparison
Cost Ratio
Compatibility
リン青銅
C52400
Lower strength, better electrical conductivity
75%
中くらい
マンガン青銅
C86300
Higher strength, lower corrosion resistance
80%
中くらい
Silicon Bronze
C87300
Better machinability, lower wear resistance
85%
中くらい
ベリリウム銅
C17200
Higher strength, excellent spring properties
180%
Medium-Low
Nickel-Silver
C75200
Lower strength, good corrosion resistance
90%
Low-Medium
4.4 Non-Copper Based Alternatives
Table 9: Non-Copper Based Alternative Materials
Material Category
Example Grade
Comparative Performance
Cost Ratio
Application Overlap
ステンレス鋼
316L
Higher strength, lower friction
65%
中くらい
ニッケル合金
モネル400
Superior corrosion resistance, higher cost
160%
High for marine
チタン合金
Ti-6Al-4V
Higher strength-to-weight, much higher cost
280%
Low-Medium
Engineered Plastics
PEEK
Lightweight, self-lubricating, lower strength
85%
低い
Composite Bearings
PTFE/Fiber
Low friction, limited load capacity
70%
非常に低い
5. Cost-Performance Analysis
5.1 Relative Material Cost Index
Table 10: Relative Material Cost Index (C63200 = 100)
材料
原材料費
処理コスト
Total Cost Index
Cost Trend (2-Year)
C63200
100
100
100
Stable
CuAl10Ni5Fe4 (EN)
95-105
95-105
95-105
Stable
C63000
100-110
100-105
100-108
Slight increase
C95400
75-85
90-100
80-90
Stable
C95800
110-120
105-115
110-120
Increasing
316L Stainless
55-65
70-80
60-70
Volatile
モネル400
150-170
140-160
145-165
Increasing
PEEK
160-180
40-50
80-90
Stable
5.2 Performance Rating by Application
Table 11: Performance Rating by Application (1-10 scale, 10=best)
材料
マリン
Oil & Gas
航空宇宙
Heavy Machinery
Overall Value Rating
C63200
9
8
8
9
8.5
CuAl10Ni5Fe4
9
8
8
9
8.5
C95400
7
7
6
8
7.5
C95800
9
9
8
8
8.8
316L Stainless
7
7
6
6
7.5
モネル400
9
9
7
6
7.0
PEEK
6
7
8
5
6.5
6。製造上の考慮事項
6.1 Processability Comparison
Table 12: Manufacturing Process Suitability (1-10 scale, 10=excellent)
材料
砂型鋳造
遠心鋳造
インベストメント鋳造
被削性
溶接性
C63200
9
9
8
7
6
CuAl10Ni5Fe4
9
9
8
7
6
C95400
8
9
7
6
5
C95800
8
9
7
6
6
316L Stainless
6
7
8
5
8
モネル400
6
7
7
5
7
PEEK
該当なし
該当なし
該当なし
8
該当なし
6.2 Supply Chain Considerations
Table 13: Supply Chain Factors
材料
Global Availability
Lead Time (weeks)
Supplier Diversity
Price Stability
C63200
高い
4-6
高い
中くらい
CuAl10Ni5Fe4
高い
4-6
高い
中くらい
C95400
高い
3-5
高い
中くらい
C95800
中~高
5-8
中くらい
Low-Medium
316L Stainless
非常に高い
2-4
非常に高い
中くらい
モネル400
中くらい
6-10
中くらい
低い
PEEK
中くらい
3-5
中くらい
高い
7. Application-Specific Equivalence
Table 14: Recommended Alternatives by Application
応用
First Choice
2番目の選択
Third Choice
Key Selection Factor
Marine bearings
C63200
C95800
モネル400
耐食性
Valve components
C63200
CuAl10Ni5Fe4
316L
Pressure handling
Pump bushings
C63200
C95400
C95800
耐摩耗性
歯車
C63200
C95500
Hardened steel
強さ
Hydraulic components
C63200
CuAl10Ni5Fe4
PEEK
Pressure capacity
航空機の付属品
C63200
C95900
Ti-6Al-4V
Weight optimization
Offshore equipment
C63200
C95800
モネル400
耐食性
8. Selection Methodology for Equivalent Materials
Table 15: Decision Matrix for Material Selection
Selection Factor
重さ
C63200
CuAl10Ni5Fe4
C95800
316L SS
モネル400
PEEK
Mechanical strength
20%
9
9
8
8
7
5
耐食性
25%
8
8
9
7
9
9
耐摩耗性
20%
9
9
8
6
7
6
Cost-effectiveness
15%
7
7
6
8
5
6
可用性
10%
8
8
7
9
6
7
Processability
10%
8
8
8
7
6
8
Weighted Score
100%
8.25
8.25
7.85
7.30
6.90
6.75
9. Conclusion and Recommendations
C63200 aluminum bronze remains an excellent material choice for demanding applications requiring a combination of strength, corrosion resistance, and wear properties. The most direct equivalent alternatives are found in the European standard CuAl10Ni5Fe4 and the Chinese standard QAl10-4-4, which offer nearly identical performance characteristics and cost.
For cost-sensitive applications where some performance compromise is acceptable, C95400 aluminum bronze presents a viable alternative at approximately 15-20% lower cost. In highly corrosive environments, particularly seawater applications, C95800 nickel aluminum bronze may justify its 10-20% higher cost through superior longevity.
For procurement professionals, the following recommendations apply:
Request material certification documentation to verify composition and properties
Consider regional availability and lead times in sourcing decisions
Evaluate total cost of ownership including maintenance and replacement frequency
Build relationships with multiple suppliers to ensure material availability
For critical applications, conduct performance testing with alternative materials before full implementation
By carefully evaluating the equivalence factors presented in this analysis, procurement specialists and engineers can make informed decisions when selecting alternatives to C63200 aluminum bronze, balancing performance requirements with cost considerations.
最高のエクスペリエンスを提供するために、当社では Cookie などのテクノロジーを使用してデバイス情報を保存および/またはアクセスします。これらのテクノロジーに同意すると、このサイトの閲覧行動や固有の ID などのデータを処理できるようになります。同意しない、または同意を撤回すると、特定の機能に悪影響を及ぼす可能性があります。