1. Introduction

C63200 aluminum bronze, a high-performance copper-based alloy, is widely used in critical applications across marine, aerospace, oil and gas, and heavy machinery industries. This comprehensive analysis examines C63200 alongside its potential equivalent alternatives, providing detailed comparisons of chemical composition, mechanical properties, manufacturing considerations, and cost-performance ratios. This guide aims to assist procurement specialists, engineers, and material selection professionals in making informed decisions when sourcing materials for demanding applications.

2. C63200 Aluminum Bronze: Baseline Specifications

Table 1: Chemical Composition of C63200 Aluminum Bronze (%)

AlAvecFePbMnNiEt
8,7-9,5Rem.3.5-4.30.02 maximum1.2-2.04.0-4.80.1 maximum
9.0000*82.0000*4.0000*1.6000*4.0000*

*Nominal values

Table 2: Mechanical Properties of C63200 Aluminum Bronze

PropriétéValeurUnité
Résistance à la traction621-950MPa
Limite d'élasticité310-365MPa
Élongation9-25%
Dureté Brinell120-210HB
Densité7.6g/cm³
Propriétés mécaniques de l'acier à outils AISI HSS M2110GPa
Conductivité thermique42W/m·K
Coefficient de dilatation thermique16.2µm/m·K
Conductivité électrique7% IACS

3. Direct Equivalent Alternatives to C63200

3.1 International Standard Equivalents

Table 3: International Standards Equivalents for C63200

PaysStandardLa désignationEquivalence Level
Etats-UnisASTHMEUNS C63200Reference
L'Europe AUCuAl10Ni5Fe4Haut
AllemagneDECuAl10Ni5Fe4Haut
Royaume-UniBSCA106Haut
JaponJISCAC702Moyen
ChineFRQAl10-4-4Haut
RussieGOSTBrAZhNMts 9-4-4-1Moyen
InternationalISOCuAl10Fe5Ni5Moyen-élevé

3.2 Chemical Composition Comparison

Table 4: Chemical Composition Comparison of C63200 and Its Direct Equivalents (%)

AlliageStandardAlAvecFePbMnNiEtLes autres
C63200ASTHME8,7-9,5Rem.3.5-4.30.02 maximum1.2-2.04.0-4.80.1 maximum
CuAl10Ni5Fe4AU8.5-10.5Rem.3.0-5.00.02 maximum0.5-2.54.0-6.00.1 maximumZn≤0.5
CA106BS8.8-10.0Rem.3.0-5.000,01 maximum0.5-2.04.0-5.50.1 maximumZn≤0.5
CAC702JIS8.5-10.0Rem.2.0-4.000,05 maximum1,5-3,04.0-5.50.3 maximum
QAl10-4-4FR9.0-10.5Rem.3.5-5.000,01 maximum0.5-2.04.0-5.00.1 maximum

3.3 Mechanical Properties Comparison

Table 5: Mechanical Properties Comparison of C63200 and Direct Equivalents

AlliageRésistance à la traction (MPa)Limite d'élasticité (MPa)Allongement (%)Dureté (HB)
C63200 (ASTM)621-950310-3659-25120-210
CuAl10Ni5Fe4 (EN)650-830300-35010-20140-200
CA106 (BS)640-800300-34012-18140-190
CAC702 (JIS)590-780280-33010-18130-180
QAl10-4-4 (GB)640-820300-35010-20140-200

4. Alternative Material Categories

4.1 Other Aluminum Bronze Grades

Table 6: Alternative Aluminum Bronze Grades Comparison

AlliageUNS#Al (%)Différences clésCoût relatifNote de performance
C63000C630009.0-11.0Higher Al, similar properties105%Haut
C63020C6302010.0-11.5Higher strength, less ductile110%Haut
C62300C623008.5-10.0Lower Ni, reduced strength85%Moyen-élevé
C95400C9540010.0-11.5No Ni, lower corrosion resistance80%Moyen
C95500C9550010.0-11.5Contains Ni, higher strength90%Haut

4.2 Nickel Aluminum Bronze Alternatives

Table 7: Nickel Aluminum Bronze Alternatives

AlliageUNS#Key CompositionPropriétés clésCost Ratio to C63200Meilleures applications
C95800C95800Cu-9Al-4Fe-4NiHigher corrosion resistance115%Marine propellers, pumps
C95700C95700Cu-12Al-6Fe-2NiRésistance supérieure, ductilité inférieure110%Roulements robustes
C95900C95900Cu-12Al-6Ni-2.5FeExcellente résistance à l'usure120%Aircraft landing gear parts

4.3 Non-Aluminum Bronze Alternatives

Table 8: Non-Aluminum Bronze Alternative Materials

Material CategoryExample AlloyKey Properties ComparisonCost RatioCompatibility
Bronze phosphoreuxC52400Lower strength, better electrical conductivity75%Moyen
Manganese BronzeC86300Higher strength, lower corrosion resistance80%Moyen
Silicon BronzeC87300Better machinability, lower wear resistance85%Moyen
Cuivre berylliumC17200Higher strength, excellent spring properties180%Medium-Low
Nickel-SilverC75200Lower strength, good corrosion resistance90%Low-Medium

4.4 Non-Copper Based Alternatives

Table 9: Non-Copper Based Alternative Materials

Material CategoryExample GradeComparative PerformanceCost RatioApplication Overlap
Acier inoxydable316LHigher strength, lower friction65%Moyen
Alliages de nickelMonels 400Superior corrosion resistance, higher cost160%High for marine
Titanium AlloysTi-6Al-4VHigher strength-to-weight, much higher cost280%Low-Medium
Engineered PlasticsPEEKLightweight, self-lubricating, lower strength85%Faible
Composite BearingsPTFE/FiberLow friction, limited load capacity70%Très bas

5. Cost-Performance Analysis

5.1 Relative Material Cost Index

Table 10: Relative Material Cost Index (C63200 = 100)

MatérielCoût des matières premièresCoût de traitementTotal Cost IndexCost Trend (2-Year)
C63200100100100Stable
CuAl10Ni5Fe4 (EN)95-10595-10595-105Stable
C63000100-110100-105100-108Slight increase
C9540075-8590-10080-90Stable
C95800110-120105-115110-120Increasing
316L Stainless55-6570-8060-70Volatile
Monels 400150-170140-160145-165Increasing
PEEK160-18040-5080-90Stable

5.2 Performance Rating by Application

Table 11: Performance Rating by Application (1-10 scale, 10=best)

MatérielMarinOil & GasAérospatialHeavy MachineryOverall Value Rating
C6320098898.5
CuAl10Ni5Fe498898.5
C9540077687.5
C9580099888.8
316L Stainless77667.5
Monels 40099767.0
PEEK67856.5

6. Manufacturing Considerations

6.1 Processability Comparison

Table 12: Manufacturing Process Suitability (1-10 scale, 10=excellent)

MatérielMoulage au sableCoulée centrifugeMoulage d'investissementUsinabilitéSoudabilité
C6320099876
CuAl10Ni5Fe499876
C9540089765
C9580089766
316L Stainless67858
Monels 40067757
PEEKN / AN / AN / A8N / A

6.2 Supply Chain Considerations

Table 13: Supply Chain Factors

MatérielGlobal AvailabilityLead Time (weeks)Supplier DiversityPrice Stability
C63200Haut4-6HautMoyen
CuAl10Ni5Fe4Haut4-6HautMoyen
C95400Haut3-5HautMoyen
C95800Moyen-élevé5-8MoyenLow-Medium
316L StainlessTrès haut2-4Très hautMoyen
Monels 400Moyen6-10MoyenFaible
PEEKMoyen3-5MoyenHaut

7. Application-Specific Equivalence

Table 14: Recommended Alternatives by Application

ApplicationFirst ChoiceSecond ChoiceThird ChoiceKey Selection Factor
Marine bearingsC63200C95800Monels 400mais il y a des limites
Composants de vannesC63200CuAl10Ni5Fe4316LPressure handling
Pump bushingsC63200C95400C95800Résistance à l'usure
EngrenagesC63200C95500Hardened steelForce
Hydraulic componentsC63200CuAl10Ni5Fe4PEEKPressure capacity
Aménagements d'avionsC63200C95900Ti-6Al-4VWeight optimization
Offshore equipmentC63200C95800Monels 400mais il y a des limites

8. Selection Methodology for Equivalent Materials

Table 15: Decision Matrix for Material Selection

Selection FactorMasseC63200CuAl10Ni5Fe4C95800316L SSMonels 400PEEK
Mechanical strength20%998875
mais il y a des limites25%889799
Résistance à l'usure20%998676
Cost-effectiveness15%776856
Disponibilitédix%887967
Processabilitydix%888768
Weighted Score100%8.258.257,857.306.906,75

9. Conclusion and Recommendations

C63200 aluminum bronze remains an excellent material choice for demanding applications requiring a combination of strength, corrosion resistance, and wear properties. The most direct equivalent alternatives are found in the European standard CuAl10Ni5Fe4 and the Chinese standard QAl10-4-4, which offer nearly identical performance characteristics and cost.

For cost-sensitive applications where some performance compromise is acceptable, C95400 aluminum bronze presents a viable alternative at approximately 15-20% lower cost. In highly corrosive environments, particularly seawater applications, C95800 nickel aluminum bronze may justify its 10-20% higher cost through superior longevity.

For procurement professionals, the following recommendations apply:

  1. Request material certification documentation to verify composition and properties
  2. Consider regional availability and lead times in sourcing decisions
  3. Evaluate total cost of ownership including maintenance and replacement frequency
  4. Build relationships with multiple suppliers to ensure material availability
  5. For critical applications, conduct performance testing with alternative materials before full implementation

By carefully evaluating the equivalence factors presented in this analysis, procurement specialists and engineers can make informed decisions when selecting alternatives to C63200 aluminum bronze, balancing performance requirements with cost considerations.